Homosexuality. Rape. Drugs. All of these things happen
and exist in the real world. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen
Chbosky portrays these topics and more. Because adults find that its content is
too mature for teenagers, the novel has been challenged to be taken off of
bookshelves at schools. Despite mentioning sexual content, drug abuse, and
more, The Perks of Being a Wallflower should not be banned because it
serves as an educational text, as it does portray events that occur in the real
world.
One reason why the novel should not be banned is because
it teaches teenagers how to communicate with those who come from different
backgrounds and have different experiences from them. Garth Stein, an author of
a challenged book, says “You’re only diminishing a young person’s ability to go
off into the world and interface with people from all walks of life” (qtd. in The
Wilds of Education). This suggests that if you ban The Perks of Being a
Wallflower because of its “mature” content, teenagers will not be able to
communicate with people from different backgrounds in an effective way. You
will not understand what they are talking about and might end up offending
someone because of your lack of knowledge. In the book, Brad, Patrick’s
ex-boyfriend, was brought up with the belief that being gay is wrong. Without
any other knowledge or viewpoints of homosexuality from books or other sources,
Brad did not know how to communicate with homosexuals, such as Patrick. Brad
would get drunk, have sex with Patrick, and claim he did not remember anything
(Chbosky 45-47).Brad did not know how to communicate to Patrick his feelings
because of his limited knowledge of the situation. This shows that the novel
can teach teenagers how to communicate with all types of people.
Another significant reason why The Perks of Being a
Wallflower should not be banned is because it shows different situations
that teenager might experience. The book has been challenged because of
“profanity…drug use, sexual behavior…” (Banned Books Awareness). These are situations
that occur in life. As teenagers enter high school, they are going to start
encountering such events as to why the book was challenged. Instead of having a
teen walk into a situation like this, not knowing what to do and what decisions
to make, why not give them a heads up? Why not let teenagers be aware of what
they might encounter? Although adults might think that these situations are too
mature for teenagers to read about, they are going to happen. Teenagers are
going to find out about these things, whether it is from firsthand experience
or a book. In the book, Charlie, the main character, went to a party with some
friends, where drugs were being used (Chbosky 34-35). Charlie had no knowledge
of such things happening. He had no idea how to react to such an environment
and he didn’t know that he was being handed a “pot brownie” when he ate it. He
simply thought it was a regular brownie. Teenagers can learn from reading about
Charlie’s experience. They can learn what might happen to them and what choices
they might have to make in life.
A last reason why The Perks of Being a Wallflower should
not be banned is because it helps teens understand the world around them. Garth
Stein said “ …in the eighth grade, he read a book, recommended by a school
librarian, in which bullies tormented a kid…it upset him, because it was a
situation alien to his own…’It showed me that this happens,’ he explained, with
a note of gratitude in his voice. ‘It made me understand’” (qtd.in Bruni). This
shows that by reading that book, it made him understand the world better. It
made him realize that these things do happen and that they are not just stories
or myths. In the novel, Charlie’s brother and sister threw a party. Charlie was
in his room, when a boy and his girlfriend came in. The boy started raping his
girlfriend, all while Charlie was in the room (Chbosky 30-31).Charlie didn’t
know what was happening. If he perhaps had some knowledge of what was going on
he could have stopped it, or told someone who could have stopped it. Reading The
Perks of Being a Wallflower might help a teenager understand a situation
like this and might allow them to help someone while they’re still young and
later on in life.
Despite people saying that The Perks of Being a
Wallflower has no educational content, it should not be banned. The novel teaches
students about the world around them and what happens in it. The book should be
read by ages 13 and up. If people are really opposed to the idea of the book
being in classrooms, students should be allowed to get permission from a
teacher or a parent saying that they can read this book. Doing this won’t make
the book completely inaccessible to students. By banning the book completely,
you’re making it difficult for teenagers to access information about the real
world that they’re going to need someday.
Works
Cited
Banned
Books Awareness. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2014.
<http://bannedbooks.world.edu/2011/05/15/banned-books-awareness-perks-wallflower/>.
Bruni,
Frank. “The Wilds of Education.” New York
Times.28 Sep.2014: SIRS Issues
Reseracher.Web.21 Nov.2014
Chbosky,
Stephen. The Perks of Being a Wallflower. New York: Pocket, 1999. 30+. Print.